Short Communication
Print
Short Communication
Simulation of time to failure of porous dielectric in advanced topology integrated circuit metallization system
expand article infoAndrey A. Orlov§, Askar A. Rezvanov§
‡ Molecular Electronics Research Institute, Moscow, Russia
§ Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (National Research University), Dolgoprudny, Russia
Open Access

Abstract

In this work, the simulation of the processes of diffusion of metal barrier ions into a low-k dielectric between two nearby copper lines was performed. Based on experimental data on the diffusion coefficient published in the scientific literature and calculations according to the mathematical model of the distribution of metal barrier ions in the dielectric, the time dependent breakdown of a porous low-k dielectric in the elements of very large-scale integrated circuits of the modern topological level was estimated. Additionally, the work obtained dependences of the dielectric breakdown time on the distance between two nearby copper lines along with dependence on the power voltage of the line (the other line is grounded).

Keywords

low-k dielectric, porosity, time dependent dielectric breakdown, copper metallization

1. Introduction

With the permanent reduction of topological level in the fabrication of very large scale integrated circuits (VLSI) and the introduction of new materials (e.g. porous low-k SiOC dielectrics) under the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS 2020), the time dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) is among the main problems causing VLSI failure [1]. Time dependent dielectric breakdown is a mechanism of failure in the metallization system when dielectric breakdown results from a long-term exposure to an electric field.

The main causes of VLSI degradation in copper metallization systems for ≤90 nm topological level are copper ion diffusion and drift into the dielectric under an external electric field [2–5]. However, ≤32 nm design topological level require potential ion currents in the diffusion barrier between the copper and the dielectric be taken into account.

The cause of TDDB is believed to be the formation of a conducting layer of traps connecting two nearby metallization lines (electrodes) which eventually leads to a significant current increase. It is believed that the traps (localization centers of electrons tunneling from electrodes) are formed by diffusion of metallic barrier ions (e.g. Ta/TaN) [6]. The local conductivity between copper lines depends on the probability of an electron jump between nearby centers which in turn is an exponential function of the distance between the centers (Eq. (1)):

σi,j~γi,j0exp-2ri,ja-εi,jkBT. (1)

where ri,j is the distance between the i and j centers, a is the radius of electron localization at these centers, εi,j is the energy barrier between the two centers, kB is Boltzmann’s constant and T is the temperature.

The traps form a network of resistors where the resistivity Ri,j between the i and j centers is inversely proportional to the local conductivity σi,j. Furthermore, the distance ri,j in the 2D system is determined by the concentration of the metallic barrier ions C (x,y,t) which for the considered layer is expressed as ri,j = C (x,y,t)–1/2 [7]. Due to the difference in the distance between the centers and the exponential difference between the resistivities, the full resistance of the conducting path is determined by the minimum value of the concentration (schematic in Fig. 1; d is the distance between the copper lines).

Figure 1. 

Schematic of physical processes in simulated structure containing two nearby copper lines separated by dielectric [9]. Input parameters: T is temperature, D is metal atom diffusion coefficient in dielectric, k is dielectric permeability of dielectric and E is electric field magnitude between copper lines

The aim of this work is to develop a mathematical model of the distribution of metal barrier ions in a low-k dielectric and to estimate the influence of the input parameters of the model on the numerical value of the time dependent breakdown of the dielectric.

2. Simulation of time dependent dielectric breakdown

The normalized minimum concentration of the metal ions  can be determined from the equation of diffusion and ion drift in electric field (Eq. (2)) and the boundary conditions at the electrodes (Eq. 3)) [8]:

Cnorm t=DΔCnorm -qDECnorm kBT; (2)

C norm (x = 0) = Cnorm (x = d) = 1. (3)

The calculations of the normalized metallic ion concentration between two nearby copper lines as a function of time as illustrated in Fig. 2 were carried out using Multiphysics® COMSOL software by the finite elements methods (the input parameters of simulation are shown on the top of Fig. 2) [7]. The normalized concentration vs time graph allows to determine the time to failure (TTF) of the dielectric under the condition  ≈ 1 (the TTF definition range is shown in Fig. 3). In this considered the TTF is approx. 1.25 · 108 s (≈3.96 years). Similar calculations were also carried out for earlier reported parameters [10]. The TTF obtained for this case is approx. 4 h (the input data are shown in Fig. 4).

Figure 2. 

Distribution of ion concentration in metallic barrier between two nearby copper lines. Input parameters: k = 2.9; d = 40 nm; potential difference ∆V = 1.1 V; D = D0 exp(-Ea/kBT), where D0 = 2 · 10-11 m2/s, activation energy Ea = 0.9 eV and T = 333 K

Figure 3. 

Determination of time to failure (TTF) of porous dielectric

Figure 4. 

Distribution of ion concentration in metallic barrier between two nearby copper lines. Input parameters: k = 2.3; d = 20 nm; potential difference ∆V = 1.1 V; D = 5.1 · 10-20 m2/s; T = 673 K

The required input parameters for simulation can be obtained from experimental data. It was shown [11] that the average diffusion length of ions can be approximated by the expression 2(Dt)1/2, where D and t are the ion diffusion coefficient in the material and the diffusion time, respectively. Further, approximating Arrhenius’ graph (diffusion coefficient D as a function of temperature T), the parameter D0 and the diffusion activation energy Ea can be derived from Eq. (4) using the following well-known relationship between the diffusion coefficient and temperature:

D = D0 exp(-Ea/kBT). (4)

Diffusion length can be measured, for example, using transmission microscopy. Also, Arrhenius’ graph can be calculated from X-ray diffraction profiles [11].

Figure 5 shows the TTF as a function of the distance d between two nearby copper lines at constant diffusion coefficient D, temperature T and dielectric permeability k. Approximation of the resultant function has an exponential pattern and is described by the following expression:

TTF=A1expdt1+A2expdt2+TTF0. (5)

For the parameters used for the simulation in Fig. 2 [7], the coefficients in Eq. (5) are as follows: A1 = 3.33739, A2 = 3.33739, t1 = 55.8961, t2 = 68.31746, and TTF0 = –8.66352.

In this work the potential difference (or, equivalently, the electric field) between two nearby lines is accepted to be constant which is the case for the following bias line powering schemes: powered line / grounded line, powered line / periodic signal, periodic signal / periodic signal. The case “powered line / periodic signal” will be analyzed in further studies.

Figure 6 shows the TTF as a function of the power voltage VDD (the other line being grounded) at constant diffusion coefficient D, temperature T and dielectric permeability k.

Approximation of the resultant function also has an exponential pattern and is described by the following expression:

TTF=A1expVDDt1+TTF0. (6)

For the parameters used for the simulation in Fig. 2 [7], the coefficients in Eq. (6) are as follows: A1 = 67.11307, t1 = –0.24943, and TTF0 = 3.17971.

Figure 5. 

TTF as a function of distance between copper lines (at constant D, T and k)

Figure 6. 

TTF as a function of power voltage VDD (the other line being grounded) at constant D, T and k

3. Conclusion

Thus this work reports a method for estimating the time to failure of a porous dielectric in VLSI systems that is based on the determination of the diffusion coefficient from experimental data and calculations within a mathematical model of ion distribution for a metallic barrier in the low-k dielectric between two nearby copper lines. Additionally the TTF was calculated as a function of the distance between two nearby copper lines and as a function of one line’s power voltage (the other line is grounded). These functions are showed to be exponential. Further studies are planned for analyzing the change in the TTF with a periodic signal being supplied to one line (the other line is grounded) as well as the TTF as a function of integrated circuit topology geometry.

References

  • 3. Lloyd J.R., Murray C.E., Ponoth S., Cohen S., Liniger E. The effect of Cu diffusion on the TDDB behavior in a low-k interlevel dielectrics. Microelectronics Reliability. 2006; 46(9–11): 1643–1647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2006.08.003
  • 4. Chen F., Bravo O., Chanda K., McLaughlin P., Sullivan T., Gill J., Lloyd J., Kontra R., Aitken J. A comprehensive study of low-k SiCOH TDDB phenomena and its reliability lifetime model development. In: Proc. of the Intern. Reliability Physics Symposium. 26-30, March 2006. New York: IEEE; 2006. P. 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251190
  • 5. Suzumura N., Yamamoto S., Kodama D., Makabe K., Komori J., Murakami E., Maegawa S., Kubota K. A new TDDB degradation model based on Cu ion drift in Cu interconnect dielectrics. In: Proc. of the Intern. Reliability Physics Symposium. 26–30, March 2006. New York: IEEE; 2006. P. 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1109/RELPHY.2006.251266
  • 6. Tan T.L., Gan C.L., Du A.Y., Cheng C.K. Effect of Ta migration from sidewall barrier on leakage current in Cu/SiOCH low-k dielectrics. Journal of Applied Physics. 2009; 106(4): 043517. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3202387
  • 7. Huang X., Sukharev V., Qi Z.-D., Kim T.-Y., Tan S. X.-D. Physics-based full-chip TDDB assessment for BEOL interconnects. In: Proc. of the 53rd Annual Design Automation Conference 2016 – DAC ’16. 05–09, June 2016. Austin, USA: IEEE; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897937.2898062
  • 8. Groove A.S. Physics and Technology of Semiconductor Devices. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1967.
  • 9. Valeev A.S., Krasnikov G.Yu. Manufacturing technology of intra- and interchip interconnects for modern ULSIs: Review and concepts of development. Russian Microelectronics. 2015; 44(3): 154–172. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063739715030087
  • 10. Yang L.Y., Zhang D.H., Li C.Y., Liu R., Wee A.T.S., Foo P.D. Characterization of Cu/Ta/ultra low-k porous polymer structures for multilevel interconnects. Thin Solid Films. 2004; 462–463: 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.071
  • 11. Kuo Y.-L., Lee H.-H., Lee C., Lin J.-C., Shue S.-L., Liang M.-S., Daniels B.J. Diffusion of copper in titanium zirconium nitride thin films. Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters. 2004; 7(3): C35–C37. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1644355
login to comment