Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Natheer B. Mahmood ( natheerbasheer@gmail.com ) © 2024 Zahraa M. Jaafar, Thamir Abdul-Jabbar Jumah, Natheer B. Mahmood.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Jaafar ZM, Jumah TA-J, Mahmood NB (2024) LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 as a promising cathode material in solid-state lithium batteries: Structural and electrical characterization. Modern Electronic Materials 10(2): 115-125. https://doi.org/10.3897/j.moem.10.2.129169
|
In this study, the synthesis, structural characterization, and electrical property analysis of LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 (LM8F) and its carbon-composite variant (LM8F-10%C) as potential cathode materials for solid-state lithium batteries were reported. Employing high-energy ball milling (HEBM) followed by calcination, LM8F was synthesized using ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, lithium carbonate, manganese(II) acetate tetra-hydrate, and iron(III) phosphate as precursors. The introduction of glucose as a carbon source aimed at the formation of a carbon-coated composite to enhance the electrical conductivity of the material. Structural and morphological characteristics of the synthesized materials were elucidated through X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FeSEM). The XRD results confirmed the olivine and orthorhombic structure of the synthesized material, highlighting its suitability for use as a cathode in solid-state lithium batteries. Electrical properties were assessed using an LCR meter to examine the impact of carbon coating on electrochemical performance. The findings demonstrated that the inclusion of carbon significantly improved the electrical conductivity, potentially leading to enhanced battery performance. This work contributes to the development of high-performance cathode materials for solid-state lithium batteries, paving the way for future advancements in energy storage technologies.
lithium manganese iron phosphate (LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4), high-energy ball milling (HEBM), carbon composite cathode materials, solid-state lithium batteries
The quest for advanced cathode materials that can fulfill the growing demands of solid-state lithium batteries has intensified in recent years [
LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 (LM8F) was synthesized using HEBM on MiniMill II apparatus. The starting materials included ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (NH4H2PO4) as the phosphate source, lithium carbonate (Li2CO3) as the lithium source, manganese(II) acetate tetra-hydrate (Mn(CH3COO)2 • 4H2O), and iron(III) phosphate (FePO4) as the sources of manganese and iron, respectively. Glucose powder (C6H12O6) was employed as a carbon source for creating a composite material. The stoichiometric calculation for obtaining LM8F was guided by the reaction equation:
Li2CO2 + 1.6 Mn(CH3COO)2 • 4H2O + 1.6NH3H2PO4 + 0.4FePO4 → 2LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 + nH2O + 4CO2 + 1.6NH3.
The mixture was subjected to high-energy ball milling at 270 rpm for 8 h. Subsequently, a portion of the milled powder was analyzed using a Q-600 Thermo-gravimetric analyzer for TGA–DSC–DTA analysis. This analysis aimed to investigate the reaction mechanism and structural stability under temperature effects. The conditions included a 60 ml/min argon gas flow and a heating rate of 20 °C/min over a temperature range from 23 °C to 1000 °C.
Post-milling, the powder was calcined at 700°C for 3 h under a nitrogen atmosphere to prevent iron oxidation.
The crystal structure of the calcined powder was studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a panalytical diffractometer operating at 45 kV and 30 mA. The diffraction patterns were collected over a 2θ range of 20° to 80° with a step time of 1 sec. using CuKα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm). For molecular property analysis, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was conducted using a SHIMADZU instrument, covering a wavenumber spectrum from 400 to 4000 cm-1 with a KBr disc method. The morphology and microstructure were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FeSEM).
To prepare the carbon-composite version, LM8F-10%C, glucose powder was mixed with the initial materials to achieve a 10% carbon content by weight, aiming for a carbon-coated product. Both the LM8F and LM8F-10%C samples were compacted into cylindrical disks (diameter = 12 mm, thickness = 1 mm) using a uniaxial hydraulic press at 100 kN pressure, and then sintered under N2 atmosphere at 700 °C for 3 h.
The electrical properties of the sintered samples were analyzed to assess the impact of carbon coating on LM8F’s electrical performance. An LCR meter (WK4310) with a frequency range of 20 Hz to 100 KHz was employed. Both Bode and Nyquist plots were utilized to distinguish between the carbon-coated and non-coated samples. The temperature’s effect on electrical impedance and conductivity was also studied using the same LCR meter, providing insights into the material’s behavior under varying thermal conditions.
This comprehensive experimental approach enabled a detailed exploration of LM8F’s suitability as a cathode material for solid-state lithium batteries, focusing on structural, morphological, and electrical characteristics, with a particular emphasis on the enhancements provided by carbon coating.
The comprehensive examination of the thermal behavior of solid solution LM8F precursors during the calcination process provides critical insights into their stability and decomposition patterns. These insights are essential for refining their synthesis for application as cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries. Figures
This dual analytical approach not only increases the precision of the thermal characterization but also streamlines the interpretation of the calcination dynamics of LM8F precursors. The DTG curve is especially beneficial as it clearly marks significant thermal events, such as decomposition or phase transitions, by showcasing peaks that correspond to rates of weight loss. This method enables a deeper investigation into the thermal stability and decomposition pathways of the precursors, pivotal for comprehending the formation mechanisms of the LM8F phase. Moreover, by linking these thermal events to specific temperatures, researchers can tailor the calcination process to achieve complete conversion of precursors into the desired cathode material, thereby reducing the formation of undesirable by-products. The analysis of LM8F precursors’ thermal behavior is more than a mere step in material synthesis; it is a gateway to understanding the complex chemical reactions that occur during heat treatment. As we delve into the results and discussion sections, we will explore the impact of these thermal characteristics on the final material properties of LM8F, such as crystal structure, purity, and electrochemical performance. Understanding the thermal decomposition and stability of these materials is fundamental to developing more efficient and durable synthesis methods, potentially leading to cathode materials that enhance the performance of lithium-ion batteries. The thermogravimetric analysis is depicted in Fig.
The successful synthesis of LM8F was confirmed through a series of structural and morphological analyses. X-ray diffraction patterns shown in Fig.
In the subsequent stage of phase determination, the XRD pattern of the calcined LM8F powder was subjected to Rietveld refinement, with the procedural intricacies depicted in Fig.
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy analysis further corroborated the structural integrity of the synthesized materials. Peaks observed in the FTIR spectra were consistent with the vibrational modes of PO4-3 groups, characteristic of the olivine phosphate structure. The absence of bands associated with impurities further confirmed the purity of the synthesized material. Figure
Figure
| 20 (deg) | d (nm) | I/I0 | FWHM total | FWHM instr. | FWHM sample | Crystallite size (nm) |
| 20.585 | 0.43112 | 520.2 | 0.3 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 40.19 |
| 22.435 | 0.39597 | 214.1 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 27.31 |
| 23.735 | 0.37457 | 84.1 | 0.3 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 40.41 |
| 25.285 | 0.35195 | 662.5 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 27.45 |
| 29.335 | 0.30421 | 741.3 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 27.69 |
| 31.935 | 0.28001 | 224.6 | 0.4 | 0.1227 | 0.2773 | 31.15 |
| 34.035 | 0.26320 | 52.5 | 0.5 | 0.1372 | 0.3628 | 33.94 |
| 35.235 | 0.25451 | 1000 | 0.4 | 0.1157 | 0.2843 | 30.65 |
| 36.085 | 0.24870 | 256.6 | 0.4 | 0.1014 | 0.2986 | 29.25 |
| 37.535 | 0.23942 | 132.5 | 0.4 | 0.0804 | 0.3196 | 27.44 |
| 39.085 | 0.23028 | 176.4 | 0.4 | 0.0861 | 0.3139 | 28.07 |
| 41.835 | 0.21575 | 166.5 | 0.3 | 0.0951 | 0.2049 | 43.39 |
| 43.885 | 0.2.0614 | 60.6 | 0.4 | 0.0992 | 0.3008 | 29.76 |
| 44.585 | 0.2.0306 | 89 | 0.4 | 0.0978 | 0.3022 | 29.7 |
| 48.685 | 0.18688 | 97.3 | 0.4 | 0.0904 | 0.3096 | 29.44 |
| 49.535 | 0.18387 | 105.5 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 29.5 |
| 50.085 | 0.18198 | 32.1 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 29.57 |
| 51.985 | 0.17577 | 344.7 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 32.53 |
| 54.935 | 0.16700 | 155.6 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 30.19 |
| 55.885 | 0.16439 | 190.4 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 30.32 |
| 57.485 | 0.16019 | 97.1 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 23.1 |
| 61.135 | 0.15147 | 217.7 | 0.7 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 25.81 |
| 63.285 | 0.14683 | 50.5 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 31.47 |
| 65.035 | 0.14330 | 43.3 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 31.77 |
| 65.735 | 0.14194 | 58.9 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 31.89 |
| 66.635 | 0.14024 | 35.2 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.31 | 32.06 |
| 69.485 | 0.13517 | 83.3 | 0.5 | 0.0948 | 0.4052 | 24.94 |
| 71.435 | 0.13195 | 80.8 | 0.5 | 0.0993 | 0.4007 | 25.53 |
| 73.485 | 0.12877 | 57.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 22.73 |
| 76.785 | 0.12403 | 48.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 23.19 |
| average = | 34.45 nm | |||||
| Index | Vibration | Peak (cm-1) |
| 1 | Asymm. Bend PO4-3 (V2) | 459.05821 |
| 2 | 509.20742 | |
| 3 | 551.64138 | |
| 4 | 578.64480 | |
| 5 | Symm. Bend PO4-3 (V2) | 636.50928 |
| 6 | Symm. Stretch PO4-3 (V1) | 979.83853 |
| 7 | Asymm. Stretch PO4-3 (V3) B3g | 1053.13354 |
| 8 | Asymm. Stretch PO4-3 (V3) B2g | 1095.56749 |
| 9 | Symm. Stretch PO4-3 (V3) | 1141.85907 |
| 10 | Symm. Bend H2O | 1438.89674 |
| 11 | 1589.34438 | |
| 12 | O2 (O–O stretching) | 1932.67363 |
| 13 | 2048.40259 | |
| 14 | Doublet CO2 (C–O asymmetric stretching) | 2341.58262 |
| 15 | 2360.87078 | |
| 16 | Asymm. Stretch OH-1 | 3406.28906 |
Electrical measurements were performed on both LM8F and LM8F-10%C samples to assess the impact of carbon coating as shown in Fig.
Temperature-dependent impedance measurements indicated a decrease in resistance with increasing temperature for both samples shown in Fig.
Figures
Bode and Nyquist plots further confirmed the superior electrical performance of the carbon-composite material. The Nyquist plots shown in Fig.
The synthesis strategy employed in this study successfully produced LM8F with a pure olivine and orthorhombic structure, as confirmed by XRD and supported by FTIR and FeSEM analyses. The addition of carbon not only improved the electrical conductivity but also enhanced the thermal stability and ion mobility of the material, as evidenced by temperature-dependent impedance measurements.
(a) Electrical conductivity and (b) electrical impedance and phase angle of LM8F and LM8F-10%C varied with temperature
(a) Dielectric constant and (b) dielectric lose factor of LM8F and LM8F-10%C varied with temperature
This study thoroughly examined the thermal behavior, structural features, and electrical properties of LiMn0.8Fe0.2PO4 (LM8F) and its carbon-coated variants for lithium-ion battery cathodes. Through thermogravimetric and differential thermal analyses, we identified critical thermal stability and decomposition patterns, essential for optimizing calcination processes and achieving high-purity cathode materials. X-ray diffraction and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy confirmed the structural integrity of synthesized LM8F. Morphological analysis highlighted the impact of semi-spherical particle shapes and agglomeration on electrochemical performance, emphasizing the importance of synthesis control. Carbon coating significantly improved LM8F’s electrical conductivity, enhancing its potential as a high-performance cathode material. These insights into LM8F’s thermal, structural, and electrical aspects advance the development of efficient, durable lithium-ion batteries, contributing to sustainable energy storage solutions.
The authors express their profound appreciation to the Nano-Group for Engineering and Material Science Analysis (NEMSA) for their exceptional support and expertise in analyzing the data presented in this study. NEMSA’s detailed and expert analysis was crucial in deepening the understanding of our experimental results, significantly elevating the quality and significance of our research. Their contribution was key to refining our interpretations and enhancing the scholarly value of our findings. We are deeply thankful for their collaboration and the essential role they have played in the progression of this study.