Research Article
Print
Research Article
Experimental study of solvent effect on the heat transfer characteristics of 4-[(4-aminophenyl)-(4-imino-1-cyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene) methyl] aniline hydrochloride – A concentration based study
expand article infoBini P. Pathrose, V. P. N. Nampoori, A. Mujeeb
‡ Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India
Open Access

Abstract

The thermal diffusivity calculations of 4-[(4-aminophenyl)-(4-imino-1-cyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene) methyl] aniline hydrochloride were made for four distinct concentrations of dye dissolved in three solvents. The number of dye aggregates at higher concentrations produce more random collisions. Because of this, heat diffusion will be slower and a reduced thermal diffusivity value was observed. Due to the increased number of dye molecules, cluster formation can also occur at higher concentrations which further reduces the thermal transport through the media. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) showed the vibrational bonds of the dye in the three solvents. The dye dissolved in acetone showed higher diffusivity as compared to the other two solvents. Our studies revealed that thermal diffusivity of the dye under study is strongly solvent dependent as well as concentration dependent. The dye under study could be effectively used as insulators or heat sinks with proper choice of concentration and solvent.

Keywords

triaminotriphenylmethane dye, thermal blooming, thermal diffusivity, solvatochromism

1. Introduction

The thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity (TD) are two important parameters that characterize the heat transfer properties of a material. The speed at which a material heats up or cools down during thermal processing is influenced by the substance’s thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity. Conduction, convection, and radiation are the three ways through which heat is transferred. Conduction is the primary mechanism for heat transfer in solid materials whereas convection plays a major role in liquids. In a heat exchanger both conduction and convection are involved. Different materials have different thermal conductivities, with metals typically being significantly greater conductors than non-metals. Thermal conductivity is a term used to describe how well a substance can conduct heat. There can be two types of heat transfer processes: steady-state and unsteady-state heat transfer. When a process is in a steady state, all the heat energy goes through the material without being heating it. Unsteady state heat transfer process is the process in which the temperature of a system or an object change as a function of time.

The thermal diffusivity is defined as the ratio of thermal conductivity to the product of specific heat and density (Eq. (1)).

TD=kρc (1)

Thermal diffusivity, provides a measurement of how quickly the temperature will vary when it is heated or cooled. High thermal diffusivity materials will heat up or cool down quickly, whereas substances with a low thermal diffusivity will heat or cool slowly. Therefore, determining thermal diffusivity is crucial when thinking about unsteady-state heat transmission scenarios. Thermodynamic diffusivity can be measured experimentally or assessed based on an understanding of the individual properties.

Molecules are significantly more tightly packed in liquids than in gases. The molecular diffusion effect, or the random movement of molecules, is what mostly determines the heat conductivity of liquids. The flow of heat through liquids is impeded by the increased random movement of molecules. Molecular motions become more random as temperature rises which prevents heat diffusion through liquids. Therefore, thermal conductivity of liquids decreases with increasing temperature except in the case of pure water. Pure water’s thermal conductivity first rises with increasing temperature and then falls. A substance with a high thermal diffusivity will also have a high thermal conductivity. The rate at which heat diffuses into the medium, increases with increasing thermal diffusivity. A low thermal diffusivity rating indicates that most heat is absorbed by the material and only a little quantity is transported further. Due to the numerous industrial heating and cooling issues, nonequilibrium heat transport is crucial.

Photothermal techniques have gained significant relevance among the numerous diffusivity calculation methods [1] because of their simplicity, dependability, reproducibility, and affordability [2]. The dual beam thermal lens approach, one of the photothermal techniques, is an effective way to determine the TD of materials in solution [3] and in solid form [4]. This is a simple, precise, sensitive, and contactless approach that works with both low volume and low absorptivity samples [5–7]. This technique was used for the diffusivity calculations of dyes [7, 8], nanofluids [9–13], nanoparticle-dye samples [3, 14–16], biodiesel blends [17], DNA-dye samples [18], magneto-optical crystals [19] etc. Pharmacological application of the thermal lens technique was studied by swapna et.al. [20]. Thermal diffusivity of chloroform, hexane, heptane, acetone, and methanol was also measured by thermal lens technique [21].

In this technique, the sample is excited by a Gaussian-profiled intensity modulated laser beam. The sample absorbs the intensity of the incident light, causing internal temperature changes that cause a gradient in the refractive index and the development of an induced lens. The induced lenses that are created are divergent ones since the majority of materials have negative temperature coefficients of resistance. To detect the created induced lens, a second laser beam-the probe beam-is used. The laser beam is diverged and extended in the far field as a result of this generated lens. This phenomenon is known as thermal blooming and is depicted in the Fig. 1.

Depending on the liquid environment of the sample under study, thermal blooming will vary and hence the TD. Nature and properties of the solvent, intensity of the Gaussian beam, aggregation of the sample etc., are the crucial parameters determining the TD of the sample. Thermal diffusivity value determines the applicability of a material as heat sinks or coolants. In this scenario the present work on calculation of TD of the dye in different solvents requires attention. The impact of solvent on the dye’s quantum efficiency has already been reported [22]. To the best of our knowledge, the influence of solvent and the concentration on the TD of the dye under study is not yet carried out.

Figure 1.

Thermal blooming of the probe beam

2. Experimental details

4-[(4-Aminophenyl)-(4-imino-1-cyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene) methyl] aniline hydrochloride, a magenta-coloured dye (molecular weight 337.85, molecular formula C20H20ClN3) [7] was purchased from M/S Sigma Aldrich. This dye is commonly used for dyeing in textile industry and for the Staining of Bactria in medical field. Figure 2 illustrates the molecular structure of the dye.

The experimental set up is shown in Fig. 3 and is already reported [7]. With the use of a neutral density filter placed between the laser and the chopper, the output from the laser source in the current investigation was adjusted to 80 mW and is employed for the studies.

For making the stock solution, the powdered dye is weighed out and is then dissolved in the proper solvents. Different diluted concentrations were made from this stock solution. The solvents were purchased from M/S Sigma Aldrich. The sample names and concentrations are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2.

Molecular structure of the dye

Table 1.

Molarity and sample names

Molarity (mol/L) Distilled water Ethanol Acetone
10-5 DW1 E1 A1
10-4 DW2 E2 A2
10-3 DW3 E3 A3
10-2 DW4 E4 A4
Figure 3.

Experimental set up for the dual beam thermal lens approach

3. Theory

The thermo-optic characteristics of the sample are found to be proportional to the measured probe beam intensity using the following expression.

I(t)=I0[1θ1+tc2(tt0)+θ22(1+tc2(tt0))2]1 (2)

Here tc is the characteristic time constant and is defined as

tc=ω2ρc4k, (3)

where ω is the beam radius, ρ is the density, c is the specific heat and k is the thermal conductivity. The parameter θ is related to the thermal power Pth and pump laser wavelength, λ by

θ=Pth(dn/dt)λk, (4)

where (dn/dt) is the temperature coefficient of refractive index of the sample. The tc and θ can be obtained by fitting the experimental data to the Eq. (2). The TD can then be calculated by

tc=ω24TD (5)

4. Results and discussions

The absorption spectrum of the dye in three solvents is measured with the corresponding solvent as the reference. The absorption peak is at 550 nm. It has previously been reported that the solvent has no effect on the dye’s absorption peak wavelength but the absorption intensity (for a particular concentration in the three solvents) is varied because of the solvatochromic effects. The absorption spectra for the dye in ethanol for four different concentrations is shown in Fig. 4a. Similar is the concentration dependent variations for the other two solvents. The normalised absorption spectra for the dye in the solvents are shown in Fig. 4b in order to examine the wavelength dependence of the dye in the solvents. The fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectrum of the dye in the three solvents and dye powder is depicted in Fig. 5.

Although the solvent has little effect on the absorption spectrum, the kind of solvent has a substantial effect on the fluorescence emission spectrum. The dye’s fluorescence emission wavelength changes depending on its concentration. The solvent properties are listed in Table 2.

Because of the solvatochromic effects, the dye’s fluorescence emission spectra in the three solvents vary depending on intensity, much like the absorption spectrum did. Figure 6a depicts the dye’s fluorescence emission spectra for four distinct concentrations of ethanol. The concentration-dependent variations for the other two solvents are similar. Figure 6b displays the dye’s normalised fluorescence emission spectra for the three different solvents. A concentration-dependent red shift is visible in the peak fluorescence emission wavelength for a certain dye. It is owing to the energy misfortunes because of dissemination of vibrational energy, reallocation of electrons in the encompassing dissolvable atoms, reorientation of the dissolvable particles, and associations between the fluorophore and the dissolvable or the solute [16]. Table 3 lists the wavelength-dependent changes for the dye in the solvents at various concentrations.

Figure 4.

(a) Absorption spectrum of the dye in ethanol (3 * 10-4 mol/L (1), 2 * 10-4 mol/L (2), 8 * 10-5 mol/L (3), 2 * 10-5 mol/L (4)), (b) normalized absorption spectra of the dye in the solvents

Figure 5.

FTIR spectrum of the dye in acetone (a), ethanol (b), distilled water (c) and powder (d)

Table 2.

Properties of solvents

Solvent name Property
Solvent type Polarity Dielectric constant (ε) Dipole moment (D) Refractive index (n) Viscosity (at 0 °C) (mPa·s)
Distilled water Polar 9 78.3 1.85 1.33 1.787
Protic
Ethanol Polar 5.2 24.3 1.69 1.35 1.720
Protic
Acetone Polar 5.1 20.7 2.88 1.36 0.4013
Aprotic
Figure 6.

(a) Fluorescence emission spectrum of the dye in ethanol (3 * 10-4 mol/L (1), 2 * 10-4 mol/L (2), 8 * 10-5 mol/L (3), 4 * 10-5 mol/L (4)), (b) normalized fluorescence emission spectrum of the dye in the solvents

Table 3.

Fluorescence emission wavelength of the dye vs solvent and molarity

Sample name Wavelength (nm) Sample name Wavelength (nm) Sample name Wavelength (nm)
DW1 600 E1 598 A1 590
DW2 618 E2 608 A2 605
DW3 640 E3 637 A3 620
DW4 668 E4 647 A4 638

The solvent dependent emission spectra can be related to refractive index, dipole moment and dielectric constant by the Lippert equation,

vAvF=2hcΔf(μEμG)2a3+ constant (6)

where

Δf=ε12ε+1n212n21. (7)

The terms h, a and c corresponds to Plank’s constant (= 6.6256 · 10-27 ergs), radius of the cavity where the fluorophore resides and speed of light (= 2.9979 · 1010 cm/s). (vA) and (vF) are wavenumbers (cm-1) corresponding to the absorption and emission. The term (∆f) is the term for orientation polarizability. The energy difference between the ground and excited states decreases as the electrical and molecular polarizability increases [22]. Temperature and viscosity also plays a crucial part in the rate of solvent relaxation [22]. Greater orientation polarizability, which is brought about by an increase in the dipole moment, results from increased solvent polarity and causes a larger Stokes shift. [23].

Typical thermal lens signal observed in the DSO for the dye in ethanol is depicted in Fig. 7a. It is fitted in MATLAB and tc and θ values are noted and is shown in Table 4. The decay curve fitted plot for the dye in ethanol is shown in Fig. 7b.

Table 4.

Thermal diffusivity and tc of the dye vs solvent type and molarity

Sample name t c (s) T D (10-8 m2/s) Sample name t c (s) T D (10-8 m2/s) Sample name t c (s) T D (10-8 m2/s)
DW1 0.1480 8.55 E1 0.1391 9.1 A1 0.0422 30
DW2 0.2801 4.52 E2 0.2751 4.6 A2 0.0452 28
DW3 0.5771 2.19 E3 0.3331 3.8 A3 0.0469 27
DW4 0.7031 1.80 E4 0.5503 2.3 A4 0.0974 13
Figure 7.

Observed thermal lens signal for the dye in ethanol (a) and thermal lens decay curve (of the dye in ethanol) fitted (b)

It is because of the solvation characteristics of the dye in different solvents, the diffusivity is varied. The dye is having maximum solubility in acetone and least solubility in distilled water. In the case of distilled water and ethanol, more aggregates will be created, which lowers the diffusivity in these solvents. The increased number of aggregates result in slower diffusion. Irrespective of the solvent, for higher concentrations, more aggregates will be formed. These increased number of aggregates not only produces extra random collisions but also produces a temperature rise. Because of this, heat diffusion will be slower and a reduced thermal diffusivity value is observed. There can also be cluster formation on higher concentrations. These clusters will further reduce the heat dissipation.

For the lifetime measurements, M/S Horiba Scientific’s DeltaPro fluorescent lifetime system based on the TCSPC approach was utilised. Fluorescence intensity decay over time is given by

I (t) = I0exp–t/τ, (8)

where τ is the fluorescence lifetime, t is the time after the absorption and I0 is the intensity at t = 0.

The fluorescence decay curve fitted using least square fitting algorithm is depicted in Fig. 8. Using the slope of the decay curve, the fluorescence lifetime was calculated. The measured average lifetime was shown in Table 5.

Table 5.

Fluorescence lifetime of the dye in solvents

Solvent name Lifetime (s)
Distilled water 0.3 · 10-9
Acetone 2.35 · 10-9
Ethanol 2.45 · 10-9
Figure 8.

Lifetime decay curve fitted for the dye in the solvents

5. Conclusions

We have studied solvent and concentration dependency on the thermal diffusivity of the dye in three solvents using laser induced dual beam thermal lens technique. It was observed that the thermal diffusivity was decreased with increasing concentration irrespective of the solvent. This is attributed to the increased number of aggregates on higher concentrations and the solvatochromic properties of solvents. The Brownian motion of the dye particles also plays a vital role in the thermal diffusivity. It was concluded that the dye studied could be effectively used as insulators or heat sinks with proper choice of concentration and solvent.

Acknowledgements

Bini P. Pathrose acknowledges Cochin University of Science and Technology (CUSAT) for the fellowship.

References

  • 1. Touloukian Y.S., Powell R.W., Ho C.Y., Nicolaou M.C. DTIC ADA129113: Thermophysical Properties of Matter – The TPRC Data Series. Vol. 10. Thermal diffusivity. Defense Technical Information Center; 1974. 757 p.
  • 3. Prakash A., Pathrose B.P., Mathew S., Nampoori V.P.N., Radhakrishnan P., Mujeeb A. Variations in thermo-optical properties of neutral red dye with laser ablated gold nanoparticles. Optical Materials. 2018; 79: 237–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OPTMAT.2018.03.044
  • 4. Savoy S.M., Wells C.A., McDevitt J.T., Rhodes T.A. Thermal diffusivity measurements of sub-micron organic dye thin films using a high temperature superconductor bolometer. Applied Physics Letters. 1998; 73(23): 3387–3389. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122775
  • 5. Bindhu C.V., Harilal S.S., Nampoori V.P.N., Vallabhan C.P.G. Thermal diffusivity measurements in organic liquids using transient thermal lens calorimetry. Optical Engineering. 1998; 37(10): 2791–2794.
  • 6. Power J.F., Salin E.D. Mode-mismatched laser induced thermal lens effect detection via spatial fourier analysis of beam profiles. Analytical Chemistry. 1988; 60(9): 838–842. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac00160a003
  • 7. Pathrose B., Nampoori V.P.N., Radhakrishnan P., Mujeeb A. Measurement of absolute fluorescence quantum yield of basic fuchsin solution using a dual-beam thermal lens technique. Journal of Fluorescence. 2014; 24(3): 895–898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-014-1369-0
  • 8. Kurian A., George S.D., Nampoori V.P.N., Vallabhan C.P.G. Study on the determination of molecular distance in organic dye mixtures using dual beam thermal lens technique. Spectrochimica Acta. Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2005; 61(13-14): 2799–2802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2004.09.032
  • 9. Jiménez-Pérez J.L., Cruz-Orea A., Sánchez-Ramírez J.F., Sánchez-Sinencio F., Martínez-Pérez L., López Muñoz G.A. Thermal characterization of nanofluids with different solvents. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2009; 30(4): 1227–1233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-009-0623-1
  • 10. Lenart V.M., Astrath N.G.C., Turchiello R.F., Goya G.F., Gómez S.L. Thermal diffusivity of ferrofluids as a function of particle size determined using the mode- mismatched dual-beam thermal lens technique. Journal of Applied Physics. 2018; 123(8): 085107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5017025
  • 11. Poon J.S., Lopes C.S., Lenart V.M., Turchiello R.F., Gómez S.L. Determination of the thermal diffusivity of plasmonic nanofluids containing PVP-coated ag nanoparticles using mode-mismatched dual-beam thermal lens technique. Advances in Condensed Matter Physics. 2018; (3): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3052793
  • 12. Susan M., Frincy F., Santhi A.J., Kala M.S. Enhanced thermal diffusivity of water based ZnO nanoflower/rGO nanofluid using the dual-beam thermal lens technique. Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects. 2021; 28(1): 100784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoso.2021.100784
  • 13. Sánchez Ramírez J.F., Jiménez Pérez J.L., Carbajal Valdez R., Cruz Orea A., Gutiérrez Fuentes R., Herrera-Pérez J.L. Thermal diffusivity measurements in fluids containing metallic nanoparticles using transient thermal lens. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2006; 27(4): 1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-006-0084-8
  • 14. Secundino-Sánchez O., Luna-Sánchez J.L., Jiménez-Pérez J.L., Sánchez-Ramırez J.F., Diaz-Reyes J., Correa-Pacheco Z.N., Carbajal-Valdez, Gutiérrez-Fuentes R.R. Thermal diffusivity study of organic dyes with TiO2 nanoparticles by photothermal techniques. International Journal of Thermophysics. 2022; 43(6): 83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10765-022-03008-x
  • 15. Pathrose B., Nampoori V.P.N., Radhakrishnan P., Sahira H., Mujeeb A. Effect of femtosecond laser ablated silver nanoparticles in the thermo-optic properties of basic fuchsin dye. Optik. 2016; 127(7): 3684–3687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.01.016
  • 16. Pathrose B.P., Prakash A., Nampoori V.P.N., Radhakrishnan P., Mujeeb A. Tuning thermo-optic properties of BF and NR dyes using plasmonic silver nanoparticles. Optical Materials. 2019; 92: 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.04.039
  • 17. Sadrolhosseini A.R., Noor A.S.M., Mehdipour L.A., Noura A., Mahdi M.A. Application of thermal lens technique to measure the thermal diffusivity of biodiesel blend. Optical Review. 2015; 22(2): 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-015-0063-z
  • 18. Udayan S., Mathew S., Vijesh K.R., Nampoori V.P.N., Sheenu Th. Thermal diffusivity and lifetime studies of Styryl 7 dye on DNA-CTMA complex. Journal of Luminescence. 2018; 194: 428–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2017.10.065
  • 19. Starobor A.V., Mironov E.A., Volkov M.R., Karimov D.N., Ivanov I.A., Lovchev A.V., Naumov A.K., Semashko V.V., Palashov O.V. Thermal lens investigation in EuF2.11, PrF3, and Na0.38HO0.62F2.24 crystals for magnetooptical applications. Optical Materials. 2020; 99: 109542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109542
  • 20. Swapna M.S., Manjusha S., Raj V., Hari M., Sankararaman S. Pharmacological application of the thermal lens technique: a thermal diffusivity study. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 2018; 35(7): 1662–1665. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.35.001662
  • 21. Mohebbifar M.R. Experimental comparison of methods based on falling and rising signal regions for thermal diffusivity measurement by pulsed dual-beam thermal lens spectroscopy. Measurement. 2020; 156: 107611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10761
  • 22. Pathrose B., Nampoori V.P.N., Radhakrishnan P., Sahira H., Mujeeb A. Solvent dependency in the quantum efficiency of 4-[(4-aminophenyl)-(4-imino-1-cyclohexa-2,5-dienylidene) methyl] aniline hydrochloride. Journal of Fluorescence. 2015; 25(3): 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-015-1560-y
  • 23. Bodke Y.D., Sheelavanth Sh., Harishkumar H.N. Synthesis of 2-(1-benzofuran-2-yl)-4-(1,3-benzoxazol-2-yl/1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl) quinolines as blue green fluorescent probes. Journal of Chemistry. 2013; 2013(12): 794810–794817. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/794810
login to comment